Keep hovering… and try to find the word we’re looking for
Signal acquired
Trace the signal hidden in the grid
Skip intro →

Project Signal

Interim Update

A brief update on how we're tracking on the project.

August 2026
Interim update

Summary

This update covers where Project Signal is up to at the end of August: the purpose of the project, the framework guiding the work, progress across the four project activities, what we are learning from the interviews and the online survey, and the steps ahead.

01Project PurposeWhat the project is set up to achieve
02The Signal FrameworkThe six dimensions of effective communication
03Progress UpdateWhat has been completed so far
04Interview and Survey FindingsWhat we are learning, and what it means
05Next StepsWorkshop dates and the pilot underway
Background

The Challenge

Safety communication across the network is currently measured by one number: whether a message was read. Whether it changed what people do is not measured. That distance, between a message being sent and a message being acted on, is the gap this project addresses.

0%
Sent · every channel
~0%
Read · where measured
?
Acted on · unmeasured

Around 70 per cent of messages are read on the channels where reading is measured. Whether any message changed behaviour is not currently known.

Section 01

Project Purpose

The purpose of Project Signal is to explore how to translate communication into behaviour.

The project seeks to understand how messages travel today, test where they cut through, and build the capability to communicate effectively and consistently.

Understand

How messages travel today

Map how safety communication moves through the network, from the national message to the person on the floor, and where it stalls.

Test

Where they cut through

Assess current communications and ask the people receiving them, so decisions rest on evidence from this organisation.

Build

The capability to communicate well

Establish a shared framework and practical skills so effective, consistent communication continues after the project.

Section 02

The Signal Framework

Opposite is using the Signal framework, which explores six dimensions of effective communication. A message needs to perform on all six to move from being sent to being acted on.

S

See It

Attention

The message is noticed in a busy, distracted environment.

I

Interpret It

Understanding

The message is understood quickly and correctly, first time.

G

Grasp Relevance

Meaning

The reader sees why it matters to them, their role and their day.

N

Navigate It

Orientation

People can find the information and know where to look.

A

Act On It

Behaviour

The required action is obvious, specific and practical.

L

Live It

Reinforcement

The message is reinforced over time until it becomes habit.

Section 03

Progress Update

The below summarises what we have completed so far.

Complete

Desktop review

Twenty current Australia Post safety communications assessed against the six dimensions, across the full channel ecosystem.

Complete

Stakeholder interviews

Ten interviews with leaders across operations, safety and support, capturing how communication lands in practice. All input de-identified.

In progress

Online survey

A short survey rating current communications against the framework. Nine responses received to date.

In development

Capability workshops

Three workshops scheduled for September and October, teaching the framework through hands-on activities and real examples.

Section 04

Interview Findings

Ten interviews have been completed with leaders across operations, safety and support. The three strongest themes are below, with what we heard, what it means, and why it matters.

Messages do not always fit the audience

What we heard
One-size national messages reach people they do not apply to. Relevance was the most consistently raised theme.
What it means
Whether a message lands is decided by site, role and the way people work, not by the sender.
Why it matters
Tailoring messages to their audience is the biggest single lever for cut-through across the organisation.

Volume is working against attention

What we heard
High message volume, several programs running at once, and pressure building into peak.
What it means
Messages compete with each other before they compete for anyone's attention.
Why it matters
Fewer, better-sequenced messages will achieve more than adding further volume.

The current message is hard to find

What we heard
Safety content sits across many channels, buried in wider updates, with outdated versions surfacing in search.
What it means
Even engaged people cannot reliably find the current version of a message.
Why it matters
A single, trusted home for safety information is a precondition for consistent action.
Section 04

Interview Findings

Three further themes cover how messages reach the frontline, how effectiveness is measured, and the strong practice that already exists.

The frontline is reached through leaders

What we heard
Many frontline workers have no company email, so messages are printed, posted and briefed by their leaders.
What it means
The leader is the channel, and delivery quality varies with the individual leader.
Why it matters
Supporting leaders to deliver well often decides whether a message arrives at all.

There is no shared measure of impact

What we heard
Teams rely on read rates and lag indicators to judge communication.
What it means
No one can currently say whether a given message changed behaviour.
Why it matters
Without a shared measure, effort flows into sending more rather than into what works.

Strong practice already exists

What we heard
Personal incident stories, sustained single-theme campaigns and engaging delivery were repeatedly described as cutting through.
What it means
Effective communication is already being produced inside the organisation.
Why it matters
The opportunity is to make the best current practice the standard everywhere.
Section 04

Online Survey Findings

Participants were asked to rate the extent to which current communications support the six dimensions of the Signal framework.

Overall, the results suggest that people are finding it difficult to navigate the information they receive and understand what they need to do as a result.

9
Responses to date
5 of 9
Changed a behaviour last month
2.7
Navigate It, the lowest dimension
2.2
Easy to find safety information, the lowest item
See It3.4
Interpret It3.3
Grasp Relevance3.6
Navigate It2.7Contributing most
Act On It2.9Contributing most
Live It3.5

Navigate It (2.7) and Act On It (2.9) are the weakest dimensions. The items behind them tell the story: ease of finding safety information scored 2.2, knowing what to do after reading scored 3.1, and having the time and support to act scored 2.9.

Section 05

Next Steps

Three workshops will build communication capability through September and October, and pilot communication materials are being developed and tested alongside them.

Wed 16 September
Workshop 1

Designing Communications that Cut Through

Tue 29 September
Workshop 2

Making Messages Matter

Wed 14 October
Workshop 3

Embedding and Sustaining Effective Communications

Pilot communication design is underway. The first materials are being developed and tested alongside the workshop series.
The full report

The detail behind this update.

This pack is a summary. The full interim report contains the complete desktop review, all interview and survey findings, the workshop design and the schedule, and it opens on this page. Posty, the guide inside the report, can take you to any section.

1 / 11